It’s like a court room where the judge is refusing to let any evidence be presented to the jury proving the innocence of the defendant. The judge is only letting the corrupt prosecutor present circumstantial evidence to the jury that implies the defendant is guilty. There are witnesses who can give the defendant an alibi, there is evidence in the form of security camera footage showing the defendant nowhere near the scene of the crime when it occurred and evidence from people giving character statements proving that the defendant is incapable of the crime but the judge won’t any of this evidence in. This is Christianity and Islam; a closed court with a crooked judge, right?

No….
~~
By “corrupt prosecutor” I hope you aren’t referring to me. If you are I’ll sue you for defamation or slander or something along those lines.
All the time. Closed-minded people don’t want to be shown evidence that disputes their rigid dogma.
No such evidence exists, at least for original and true Christianity.
Evidence…evidence. As of yet, I am unfamiliar with the word.
I’d say that’s an accurate analogy of your views on the subject…
No more, no less
I’d like to see some of that “evidence.” You’ve got none. When you have it, get back to us.
Yes – with an adjustment – religious people shut the door on evidence when it goes against their beliefs as stated in their chosen scripture. Sometimes they try to use evidence to prove their position, but always fail miserably. Any argument that has EVER been presented as proof of god, jesus, creation, etc. has done so only with logical fallacies, false information, fake data, or simple lack of understanding of the scientific method, what constitutes evidence, or what they are arguing against (for example, a lot of arguments against evolution assume things that are NOT observed in evolution).